| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-20 |
26/27
|
TS Galaxy0–1Chippa Utd |
| 2026-09-13 |
26/27
|
TS Galaxy0–1Kruger United |
| 2026-09-05 |
26/27
|
Sekhukhune Utd0–0TS Galaxy |
| 2026-08-25 |
26/27
|
TTM2–3TS Galaxy |
| 2026-08-16 |
26/27
|
TS Galaxy0–0Arrows |
| 2026-08-11 |
26/27
|
TS Galaxy2–3Mamelodi |
| 2026-08-02 |
26/27
|
Siwelele2–2TS Galaxy |
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-20 |
26/27
|
TTM0–2Pirates |
| 2026-09-17 |
26/27
|
Pirates2–0Durban City |
| 2026-09-01 |
26/27
|
Kruger United0–4Pirates |
| 2026-08-25 |
26/27
|
Pirates2–0Sekhukhune Utd |
| 2026-08-16 |
26/27
|
Chippa Utd0–3Pirates |
| 2026-08-12 |
26/27
|
AmaZulu1–1Pirates |
| 2026-08-01 |
26/27
|
Pirates2–0Milford |
| Home | Away | 1st goal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | TS Galaxy | 2–3 | Mamelodi | 1 | — |
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | AmaZulu | 3 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Kaizer Chiefs | 4 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Milford | 5 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Sekhukhune Utd | 6 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Stellenbosch | 7 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | 0–0 | Arrows | 8 | – |
| 12 | TS Galaxy | 0–1 | Chippa Utd | 9 | 62′ Away |
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Durban City | 10 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Polokwane | 11 | ||
| 12 · TS Galaxy | |||||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | 0–1 | Kruger United | 13 | 73′ Away |
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Richards Bay | 14 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Siwelele | 15 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | TTM | 16 | ||
| Home | Away | 1st goal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mamelodi | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 2 · Pirates | |||||
| 3 | AmaZulu | 1–1 | Pirates | 2 | 7′ Away |
| 4 | Kaizer Chiefs | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 5 | Milford | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 6 | Sekhukhune Utd | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 7 | Stellenbosch | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 8 | Arrows | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 9 | Chippa Utd | 0–3 | Pirates | 2 | 60′ Away |
| 10 | Durban City | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 13 | Kruger United | 0–4 | Pirates | 2 | 4′ Away |
| 14 | Richards Bay | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 15 | Siwelele | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 16 | TTM | 0–2 | Pirates | 2 | 32′ Away |
PSL · 26/27 · Completed league matches only.
| Goals & results | Home4 matches | Away3 matches | Overall7 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 0.25 | 1.67 | 0.86 |
| Draws | 25.0% | 66.7% | 42.9% |
| Goals scored / match | 0.50 | 1.67 | 1.00 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.25 | 1.33 | 1.29 |
| Total goals / match | 1.75 | 3.00 | 2.29 |
| Failed to score | 75.0% | 33.3% | 57.1% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 75.0% | 33.3% | 57.1% |
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | —— | —— |
| Scores first → wins | —— | —— |
| Concedes first → wins | —— | —— |
Scoring order known: 3/4 home.Scoring order known: 6/7 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | — | — |
| 16–30 | — | — |
| 31–45 | — | — |
| 46–60 | — | — |
| 61–75 | — | — |
| 76–90 | — | — |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
| Goals & results | Home3 matches | Away4 matches | Overall7 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 3.00 | 2.50 | 2.71 |
| Draws | 0.0% | 25.0% | 14.3% |
| Goals scored / match | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.29 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| Total goals / match | 2.00 | 2.75 | 2.43 |
| Failed to score | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 100.0% | 50.0% | 71.4% |
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | 2 of 44 of 7 | 50%57% |
| Scores first → wins | 3 of 46 of 7 | 75%86% |
| Concedes first → wins | 0 of 00 of 0 | —— |
Scoring order known: 4/4 away.Scoring order known: 7/7 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | 2 | 0 |
| 16–30 | 0 | 0 |
| 31–45 | 1 | 1 |
| 46–60 | 2 | 0 |
| 61–75 | 2 | 0 |
| 76–90 | 3 | 0 |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
The strength model considers results adjusted for opponent quality; the goals model uses recent form. Differences between them deserve a closer look.
| Model | TS Galaxy | Draw | Pirates | How it works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 26.1% | 39.4% | 34.5% | Historical results adjusted for opponent quality and the league's home advantage |
| Goals (Poisson) | 4.8% | 12.2% | 77.8% | Each team's recent attack and defence relative to the league average |
Recent results need context. These measures account for opponent quality and the balance of play.
| Measure | TS Galaxy | Pirates | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 1476 | 1585 | The league average is 1500. A higher rating indicates stronger results after adjusting for opponent quality. |
| Change over the last 10 | -25 | 73 | Rating gained or lost over the last ten matches |
| Opposition strength | 1485 | 1491 | Average opponent rating over the last 20 matches. Above 1500 indicates a tougher schedule. |
Averages hide the distribution. Teams with similar goals per match can have very different patterns of scorelines.
| Team | 1H scored | 2H scored | 1H conceded | 2H conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS Galaxy | 0.29 | 0.71 | 0.43 | 0.86 |
| Pirates | 0.71 | 1.57 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| Team | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS Galaxy | 29% | 29% | 0% | 0% | 43% |
| Pirates | 0% | 0% | 71% | 14% | 14% |
Home and away performance, rest since the last match, and each team's manager.
Averages over each team's last 20 matches. The left bar represents TS Galaxy, the right bar represents Pirates.
| Team | Last 10 | PPG | goals | streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS Galaxy | LLDWDLD | 0.86 | 1.00–1.29 | 2L |
| Pirates | WWWWWDW | 2.71 | 2.29–0.14 | 5W |
| Team | ahead | level | behind | comeback wins | lead lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TS Galaxy | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Pirates | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 players reported unavailable or doubtful across both teams, with the reason.
No absences reported.
No absences reported.
No recent news linked to these teams.
