| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 |
26/27
|
Polokwane0–1AmaZulu |
| 2026-09-12 |
26/27
|
Polokwane1–1Kaizer Chiefs |
| 2026-09-04 |
26/27
|
TTM2–2Polokwane |
| 2026-08-26 |
26/27
|
Polokwane0–0Milford |
| 2026-08-15 |
26/27
|
Sekhukhune Utd2–0Polokwane |
| 2026-08-11 |
26/27
|
Polokwane3–3Stellenbosch |
| 2026-08-02 |
26/27
|
Richards Bay1–2Polokwane |
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-20 |
26/27
|
TTM0–2Pirates |
| 2026-09-17 |
26/27
|
Pirates2–0Durban City |
| 2026-09-01 |
26/27
|
Kruger United0–4Pirates |
| 2026-08-25 |
26/27
|
Pirates2–0Sekhukhune Utd |
| 2026-08-16 |
26/27
|
Chippa Utd0–3Pirates |
| 2026-08-12 |
26/27
|
AmaZulu1–1Pirates |
| 2026-08-01 |
26/27
|
Pirates2–0Milford |
| Home | Away | 1st goal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Polokwane | Mamelodi | 1 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | 0–1 | AmaZulu | 3 | 4′ Away |
| 11 | Polokwane | 1–1 | Kaizer Chiefs | 4 | — |
| 11 | Polokwane | 0–0 | Milford | 5 | – |
| 11 | Polokwane | Sekhukhune Utd | 6 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | 3–3 | Stellenbosch | 7 | — |
| 11 | Polokwane | Arrows | 8 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Chippa Utd | 9 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Durban City | 10 | ||
| 11 · Polokwane | |||||
| 11 | Polokwane | TS Galaxy | 12 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Kruger United | 13 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Richards Bay | 14 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Siwelele | 15 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | TTM | 16 | ||
| Home | Away | 1st goal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mamelodi | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 2 · Pirates | |||||
| 3 | AmaZulu | 1–1 | Pirates | 2 | 7′ Away |
| 4 | Kaizer Chiefs | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 5 | Milford | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 6 | Sekhukhune Utd | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 7 | Stellenbosch | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 8 | Arrows | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 9 | Chippa Utd | 0–3 | Pirates | 2 | 60′ Away |
| 10 | Durban City | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 11 | Polokwane | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 12 | TS Galaxy | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 13 | Kruger United | 0–4 | Pirates | 2 | 4′ Away |
| 14 | Richards Bay | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 15 | Siwelele | Pirates | 2 | ||
| 16 | TTM | 0–2 | Pirates | 2 | 32′ Away |
PSL · 26/27 · Completed league matches only.
| Goals & results | Home4 matches | Away3 matches | Overall7 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 0.75 | 1.33 | 1.00 |
| Draws | 75.0% | 33.3% | 57.1% |
| Goals scored / match | 1.00 | 1.33 | 1.14 |
| Goals conceded / match | 1.25 | 1.67 | 1.43 |
| Total goals / match | 2.25 | 3.00 | 2.57 |
| Failed to score | 50.0% | 33.3% | 42.9% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 75.0% | 33.3% | 57.1% |
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | —— | —— |
| Scores first → wins | —— | —— |
| Concedes first → wins | —— | —— |
Scoring order known: 3/4 home.Scoring order known: 5/7 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | — | — |
| 16–30 | — | — |
| 31–45 | — | — |
| 46–60 | — | — |
| 61–75 | — | — |
| 76–90 | — | — |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
| Goals & results | Home3 matches | Away4 matches | Overall7 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 3.00 | 2.50 | 2.71 |
| Draws | 0.0% | 25.0% | 14.3% |
| Goals scored / match | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.29 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.00 | 0.25 | 0.14 |
| Total goals / match | 2.00 | 2.75 | 2.43 |
| Failed to score | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 100.0% | 50.0% | 71.4% |
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | 2 of 44 of 7 | 50%57% |
| Scores first → wins | 3 of 46 of 7 | 75%86% |
| Concedes first → wins | 0 of 00 of 0 | —— |
Scoring order known: 4/4 away.Scoring order known: 7/7 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | 2 | 0 |
| 16–30 | 0 | 0 |
| 31–45 | 1 | 1 |
| 46–60 | 2 | 0 |
| 61–75 | 2 | 0 |
| 76–90 | 3 | 0 |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
The strength model considers results adjusted for opponent quality; the goals model uses recent form. Differences between them deserve a closer look.
| Model | Polokwane | Draw | Pirates | How it works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 26.6% | 39.7% | 33.7% | Historical results adjusted for opponent quality and the league's home advantage |
| Goals (Poisson) | 4.8% | 12.2% | 77.8% | Each team's recent attack and defence relative to the league average |
Recent results need context. These measures account for opponent quality and the balance of play.
| Measure | Polokwane | Pirates | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 1484 | 1585 | The league average is 1500. A higher rating indicates stronger results after adjusting for opponent quality. |
| Change over the last 10 | -27 | 73 | Rating gained or lost over the last ten matches |
| Opposition strength | 1502 | 1491 | Average opponent rating over the last 20 matches. Above 1500 indicates a tougher schedule. |
Averages hide the distribution. Teams with similar goals per match can have very different patterns of scorelines.
| Team | 1H scored | 2H scored | 1H conceded | 2H conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polokwane | 0.57 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.43 |
| Pirates | 0.71 | 1.57 | 0.14 | 0.00 |
| Team | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polokwane | 14% | 14% | 29% | 14% | 29% |
| Pirates | 0% | 0% | 71% | 14% | 14% |
Home and away performance, rest since the last match, and each team's manager.
Averages over each team's last 20 matches. The left bar represents Polokwane, the right bar represents Pirates.
| Team | Last 10 | PPG | goals | streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polokwane | LDDDLDW | 1.00 | 1.14–1.43 | 1L |
| Pirates | WWWWWDW | 2.71 | 2.29–0.14 | 5W |
| Team | ahead | level | behind | comeback wins | lead lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polokwane | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Pirates | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
0 players reported unavailable or doubtful across both teams, with the reason.
No absences reported.
No absences reported.
No recent news linked to these teams.
