| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 |
26/27
|
Ratchaburi4–6Shanghai SIPG |
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-15 |
26/27
|
Gamba4–1CAND |
| 2026-08-11 |
26/27
|
Adelaide United0–2CAND |
| Home | Away | 1st goal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al-Ittihad | CAND | 16 | ||
| 2 | Gamba | 4–1 | CAND | 16 | 29′ Home |
| 3 | Pakhtakor | CAND | 16 | ||
| 4 | Kashima | CAND | 16 | ||
| 5 | Al Ain | CAND | 16 | ||
| 6 | Esteghlal | CAND | 16 | ||
| 7 | Shanghai SIPG | CAND | 16 | ||
| 8 | Guoan | CAND | 16 | ||
| 9 | Al-Hilal | CAND | 16 | ||
| 10 | Al-Qadsiah | CAND | 16 | ||
| 11 | Jeonbuk Motors | CAND | 16 | ||
| 12 | Vissel Kobe | CAND | 16 | ||
| 13 | Al Ahli Dubai | CAND | 16 | ||
| 14 | Daejeon | CAND | 16 | ||
| 15 | Neftchi | CAND | 16 | ||
| 16 · CAND | |||||
| 17 | Al-Ahli | CAND | 16 | ||
| 18 | Buriram Utd | CAND | 16 | ||
| 19 | Darul Ta'zim | CAND | 16 | ||
| 20 | Shamal | CAND | 16 | ||
| 21 | Gangwon | CAND | 16 | ||
| 22 | Al Wasl | CAND | 16 | ||
| 23 | Gharafa | CAND | 16 | ||
| 24 | Kashiwa | CAND | 16 | ||
| 25 | Port | CAND | 16 | ||
| 26 | Kyoto | CAND | 16 | ||
| 27 | Quwa | CAND | 16 | ||
| 28 | Tractor | CAND | 16 | ||
| 29 | Ratchaburi | CAND | 16 | ||
| 30 | Pohang | CAND | 16 | ||
| 31 | Adelaide United | 0–2 | CAND | 16 | 41′ Away |
| 32 | Al Jazira | CAND | 16 | ||
| 33 | Al Hussein | CAND | 16 | ||
| 34 | Sadd | CAND | 16 | ||
| 35 | Al-Nassr | CAND | 16 | ||
| 36 | Newcastle | CAND | 16 | ||
AFC Champions League · 26/27 · Completed league matches only.
| Goals & results | Home0 matches | Away1 matches | Overall1 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | — | 3.00 | 3.00 |
| Draws | — | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Goals scored / match | — | 6.00 | 6.00 |
| Goals conceded / match | — | 4.00 | 4.00 |
| Total goals / match | — | 10.00 | 10.00 |
| Failed to score | — | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Under 2.5 goals | — | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | 0 of 01 of 1 | —100% |
| Scores first → wins | 0 of 01 of 1 | —100% |
| Concedes first → wins | 0 of 00 of 0 | —— |
Scoring order known: 0/0 home.Scoring order known: 1/1 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | — | — |
| 16–30 | — | — |
| 31–45 | — | — |
| 46–60 | — | — |
| 61–75 | — | — |
| 76–90 | — | — |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
| Goals & results | Home0 matches | Away2 matches | Overall2 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | — | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Draws | — | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Goals scored / match | — | 1.50 | 1.50 |
| Goals conceded / match | — | 2.00 | 2.00 |
| Total goals / match | — | 3.50 | 3.50 |
| Failed to score | — | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Under 2.5 goals | — | 50.0% | 50.0% |
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | 1 of 11 of 1 | 100%100% |
| Scores first → wins | 1 of 11 of 1 | 100%100% |
| Concedes first → wins | 0 of 10 of 1 | 0%0% |
Scoring order known: 2/2 away.Scoring order known: 2/2 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | 0 | 0 |
| 16–30 | 0 | 1 |
| 31–45 | 1 | 0 |
| 46–60 | 0 | 1 |
| 61–75 | 1 | 1 |
| 76–90 | 1 | 1 |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
The strength model considers results adjusted for opponent quality; the goals model uses recent form. Differences between them deserve a closer look.
| Model | Shanghai SIPG | Draw | CAND | How it works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goals (Poisson) | 34.9% | 10.1% | 12.2% | Each team's recent attack and defence relative to the league average |
Recent results need context. These measures account for opponent quality and the balance of play.
| Measure | Shanghai SIPG | CAND | How to read it |
|---|
Averages hide the distribution. Teams with similar goals per match can have very different patterns of scorelines.
| Team | 1H scored | 2H scored | 1H conceded | 2H conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai SIPG | 3.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 |
| CAND | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.50 | 1.50 |
| Team | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai SIPG | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 100% |
| CAND | 0% | 0% | 50% | 0% | 50% |
Home and away performance, rest since the last match, and each team's manager.
Averages over each team's last 20 matches. The left bar represents Shanghai SIPG, the right bar represents CAND.
| Team | Last 10 | PPG | goals | streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai SIPG | W | 3.00 | 6.00–4.00 | 1W |
| CAND | LW | 1.50 | 1.50–2.00 | 1L |
| Team | ahead | level | behind | comeback wins | lead lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai SIPG | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CAND | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
0 players reported unavailable or doubtful across both teams, with the reason.
No absences reported.
No absences reported.
No recent news linked to these teams.
