Head-to-head overview
1 meetings- LNZ CherkasyWins
- 0
- Draws100.0% of meetings
- 1
- Dínamo KievWins
- 0
- Goals per match
- 0.00
- Over 2.5 goals
- 0.0%
- Both teams scored
- 0.0%
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-06 |
26/27
|
Dínamo Kiev0–0LNZ Cherkasy |
Recent matches
LNZ Cherkasy
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-20 |
26/27
|
Shakhtar3–0LNZ Cherkasy |
| 2026-09-12 |
26/27
|
LNZ Cherkasy3–1Obolon' Kyiv |
| 2026-09-06 |
26/27
|
Dínamo Kiev0–0LNZ Cherkasy |
| 2026-08-30 |
26/27
|
LNZ Cherkasy0–1Veres Rivne |
| 2026-08-16 |
26/27
|
LNZ Cherkasy2–0Chornomorets |
| 2026-08-10 |
26/27
|
Karpaty3–0LNZ Cherkasy |
| 2026-08-03 |
26/27
|
Bukovyna0–0LNZ Cherkasy |
Dínamo Kiev
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-19 |
26/27
|
Zorya0–2Dínamo Kiev |
| 2026-09-14 |
26/27
|
Dínamo Kiev3–0Epitsentr |
| 2026-09-06 |
26/27
|
Dínamo Kiev0–0LNZ Cherkasy |
| 2026-08-31 |
26/27
|
Bukovyna3–0Dínamo Kiev |
| 2026-08-16 |
26/27
|
Dínamo Kiev2–1Kolos |
| 2026-08-09 |
26/27
|
Veres Rivne1–2Dínamo Kiev |
LNZ Cherkasy
Dínamo Kiev
Wins
29%
67%
Over 2.5 goals
43%
67%
Both teams scored
14%
33%
Clean sheets
43%
50%
Home & away results
This season · 26/27
LNZ Cherkasy
| Home | Away | 1st goal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Shakhtar | 1 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Polessya | 2 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Karpaty | 3 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Metalist 1925 | 5 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Epitsentr | 6 | ||
| 7 · LNZ Cherkasy | |||||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Zorya | 8 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Livyi Bereh | 9 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Bukovyna | 10 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | 0–1 | Veres Rivne | 11 | 87′ Away |
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Hirnyk | 12 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Kolos | 13 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | 2–0 | Chornomorets | 14 | 41′ Home |
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | 3–1 | Obolon' Kyiv | 15 | 10′ Home |
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Kudrivka | 16 | ||
Dínamo Kiev
| Home | Away | 1st goal | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shakhtar | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 2 | Polessya | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 3 | Karpaty | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 4 · Dínamo Kiev | |||||
| 5 | Metalist 1925 | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 6 | Epitsentr | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 7 | LNZ Cherkasy | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 8 | Zorya | 0–2 | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | 82′ Away |
| 9 | Livyi Bereh | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 10 | Bukovyna | 3–0 | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | — |
| 11 | Veres Rivne | 1–2 | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | 38′ Away |
| 12 | Hirnyk | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 13 | Kolos | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 14 | Chornomorets | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 15 | Obolon' Kyiv | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
| 16 | Kudrivka | Dínamo Kiev | 4 | ||
LNZ Cherkasy Home
Dínamo Kiev Away
Wins
Over 1.5
Over 2.5
Over 3.5
Both teams scored
Clean sheets
Scores first
Season analysis
Home, away & overall
Premier League · 26/27 · Completed league matches only.
LNZ Cherkasy
| Goals & results | Home3 matches | Away4 matches | Overall7 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 2.00 | 0.50 | 1.14 |
| Draws | 0.0% | 50.0% | 28.6% |
| Goals scored / match | 1.67 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.67 | 1.50 | 1.14 |
| Total goals / match | 2.33 | 1.50 | 1.86 |
| Failed to score | 33.3% | 100.0% | 71.4% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 66.7% | 50.0% | 57.1% |
Scoring first & comebacks
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | 2 of 22 of 2 | 100%100% |
| Scores first → wins | 2 of 22 of 2 | 100%100% |
| Concedes first → wins | 0 of 10 of 3 | 0%0% |
Scoring order known: 3/3 home.Scoring order known: 7/7 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
Goal timing
Home matches| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | 2 | 0 |
| 16–30 | 0 | 0 |
| 31–45 | 2 | 0 |
| 46–60 | 1 | 0 |
| 61–75 | 0 | 1 |
| 76–90 | 0 | 1 |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
Dínamo Kiev
| Goals & results | Home3 matches | Away3 matches | Overall6 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 2.33 | 2.00 | 2.17 |
| Draws | 33.3% | 0.0% | 16.7% |
| Goals scored / match | 1.67 | 1.33 | 1.50 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.33 | 1.33 | 0.83 |
| Total goals / match | 2.00 | 2.67 | 2.33 |
| Failed to score | 33.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 33.3% | 33.3% | 33.3% |
Scoring first & comebacks
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | 1 of 22 of 4 | 50%50% |
| Scores first → wins | 2 of 24 of 4 | 100%100% |
| Concedes first → wins | 0 of 10 of 1 | 0%0% |
Scoring order known: 3/3 away.Scoring order known: 6/6 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
Goal timing
Away matches| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | — | — |
| 16–30 | — | — |
| 31–45 | — | — |
| 46–60 | — | — |
| 61–75 | — | — |
| 76–90 | — | — |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
Two perspectives
What each model says about this match
The strength model considers results adjusted for opponent quality; the goals model uses recent form. Differences between them deserve a closer look.
| Model | LNZ Cherkasy | Draw | Dínamo Kiev | How it works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 36.4% | 30.7% | 32.9% | Historical results adjusted for opponent quality and the league's home advantage |
| Goals (Poisson) | 10.1% | 21.3% | 67.5% | Each team's recent attack and defence relative to the league average |
0.53–1.81
Model expected goals
40.5%
Probability of over 2.5 goals
34.0%
Both teams to score
0-1
Most likely score, at 17.4%
Most likely scores
0-117.4%
0-215.8%
0-09.6%
0-39.5%
1-19.2%
1-28.4%
Strength and dominance
Team strength and finishing efficiency
Recent results need context. These measures account for opponent quality and the balance of play.
| Measure | LNZ Cherkasy | Dínamo Kiev | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 1490 | 1532 | The league average is 1500. A higher rating indicates stronger results after adjusting for opponent quality. |
| Change over the last 10 | -12 | 21 | Rating gained or lost over the last ten matches |
| Opposition strength | 1502 | 1492 | Average opponent rating over the last 20 matches. Above 1500 indicates a tougher schedule. |
Goals
When teams score and how matches unfold
Averages hide the distribution. Teams with similar goals per match can have very different patterns of scorelines.
Goals by half
| Team | 1H scored | 2H scored | 1H conceded | 2H conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZ Cherkasy | 0.57 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Dínamo Kiev | 0.50 | 1.00 | 0.33 | 0.50 |
Total goals
| Team | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZ Cherkasy | 29% | 14% | 14% | 29% | 14% |
| Dínamo Kiev | 17% | 0% | 17% | 67% | 0% |
Context
Coming into the match
Home and away performance, rest since the last match, and each team's manager.
2.00
LNZ Cherkasy at home, 3 matches
2.00
Dínamo Kiev away, 3 matches
181d
Days of rest for LNZ Cherkasy
182d
Days of rest for Dínamo Kiev
—
Manager of LNZ Cherkasy
—
Manager of Dínamo Kiev
0
Matches for LNZ Cherkasy in the last 14 days
0
Matches for Dínamo Kiev in the last 14 days
10
Points for LNZ Cherkasy behind the leaders, and 3 above the relegation zone
5
Points for Dínamo Kiev behind the leaders, and 8 above the relegation zone
2.27
League goals per match
30.8%
League draw rate
Statistics
Side-by-side comparison
Averages over each team's last 20 matches. The left bar represents LNZ Cherkasy, the right bar represents Dínamo Kiev.
On the ball
3.83
6.33
corners
12.25
10.4
fouls
2.67
2.0
yellow cards
Recent form
| Team | Last 10 | PPG | goals | streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZ Cherkasy | LWDLWLD | 1.14 | 0.71–1.14 | 1L |
| Dínamo Kiev | WWDLWW | 2.17 | 1.50–0.83 | 2W |
At half-time
| Team | ahead | level | behind | comeback wins | lead lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LNZ Cherkasy | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dínamo Kiev | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Squads
Injuries and suspensions
0 players reported unavailable or doubtful across both teams, with the reason.
LNZ Cherkasy
No absences reported.
Dínamo Kiev
No absences reported.
Newsroom
News about both teams
No recent news linked to these teams.