Head-to-head overview
2 meetings- Ferrymead BaysWins
- 0
- Draws0.0% of meetings
- 0
- Cashmere TechnicalWins
- 2
- Goals per match
- 4.50
- Over 2.5 goals
- 100.0%
- Both teams scored
- 0.0%
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-27 |
2026
|
Cashmere Technical4–0Ferrymead Bays |
| 2026-04-03 |
2026
|
Ferrymead Bays0–5Cashmere Technical |
Recent matches
Ferrymead Bays
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-26 |
2026
|
Ferrymead Bays0–0Eastern |
| 2026-08-30 |
2026
|
Ferrymead Bays2–1South City Royals |
| 2026-08-22 |
2026
|
Ferrymead Bays5–0Nelson Suburbs |
| 2026-08-08 |
2026
|
Ferrymead Bays1–2Nomads United |
| 2026-08-01 |
2026
|
Selwyn United0–2Ferrymead Bays |
| 2026-07-17 |
2026
|
Ferrymead Bays6–0Coastal Spirit |
| 2026-07-11 |
2026
|
Christchurch United0–0Ferrymead Bays |
| 2026-06-27 |
2026
|
Cashmere Technical4–0Ferrymead Bays |
Cashmere Technical
| Date | Season | Match |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-27 |
2026
|
Birkenhead United0–4Cashmere Technical |
| 2026-09-12 |
2026
|
Cashmere Technical11–0Wanaka |
| 2026-08-30 |
2026
|
Nelson Suburbs0–6Cashmere Technical |
| 2026-08-22 |
2026
|
Cashmere Technical3–0South City Royals |
| 2026-08-09 |
2026
|
Cashmere Technical5–1Coastal Spirit |
| 2026-08-01 |
2026
|
Christchurch United0–5Cashmere Technical |
| 2026-07-18 |
2026
|
Northern AFC0–3Cashmere Technical |
| 2026-06-27 |
2026
|
Cashmere Technical4–0Ferrymead Bays |
Ferrymead Bays
Cashmere Technical
Wins
50%
100%
Over 2.5 goals
62%
100%
Both teams scored
25%
12%
Clean sheets
62%
88%
Home & away results
This season · 2026
Ferrymead Bays
Cashmere Technical
Ferrymead Bays Home
Cashmere Technical Away
Wins
Over 1.5
Over 2.5
Over 3.5
Both teams scored
Clean sheets
Scores first
Season analysis
Home, away & overall
National League · 2026 · Completed league matches only.
Ferrymead Bays
| Goals & results | Home10 matches | Away9 matches | Overall19 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 2.20 | 1.89 | 2.05 |
| Draws | 10.0% | 22.2% | 15.8% |
| Goals scored / match | 2.40 | 1.67 | 2.05 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.80 | 1.22 | 1.00 |
| Total goals / match | 3.20 | 2.89 | 3.05 |
| Failed to score | 20.0% | 33.3% | 26.3% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 30.0% | 44.4% | 36.8% |
Scoring first & comebacks
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | 7 of 89 of 11 | 88%82% |
| Scores first → wins | 7 of 810 of 11 | 88%91% |
| Concedes first → wins | 0 of 12 of 6 | 0%33% |
Scoring order known: 10/10 home.Scoring order known: 19/19 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
Goal timing
Home matches| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | — | — |
| 16–30 | — | — |
| 31–45 | — | — |
| 46–60 | — | — |
| 61–75 | — | — |
| 76–90 | — | — |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
Cashmere Technical
| Goals & results | Home9 matches | Away10 matches | Overall19 matches |
|---|---|---|---|
| Points / match | 2.78 | 3.00 | 2.89 |
| Draws | 11.1% | 0.0% | 5.3% |
| Goals scored / match | 4.89 | 5.10 | 5.00 |
| Goals conceded / match | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.37 |
| Total goals / match | 5.33 | 5.40 | 5.37 |
| Failed to score | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 11.1% | 0.0% | 5.3% |
Scoring first & comebacks
| Match situation | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scores first → leads at half-time | —— | —— |
| Scores first → wins | —— | —— |
| Concedes first → wins | —— | —— |
Scoring order known: 9/10 away.Scoring order known: 18/19 overall. Percentages are shown only when the required data is complete.
Goal timing
Away matches| Minutes | Scored | Conceded |
|---|---|---|
| 0–15 | — | — |
| 16–30 | — | — |
| 31–45 | — | — |
| 46–60 | — | — |
| 61–75 | — | — |
| 76–90 | — | — |
Goal-minute data is not available. “—” means unavailable, not zero. The 31–45 and 76–90 intervals include stoppage time.
Two perspectives
What each model says about this match
The strength model considers results adjusted for opponent quality; the goals model uses recent form. Differences between them deserve a closer look.
| Model | Ferrymead Bays | Draw | Cashmere Technical | How it works |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 30.2% | 13.6% | 56.2% | Historical results adjusted for opponent quality and the league's home advantage |
| Goals (Poisson) | 10.2% | 15.8% | 69.8% | Each team's recent attack and defence relative to the league average |
0.82–2.50
Model expected goals
60.2%
Probability of over 2.5 goals
49.0%
Both teams to score
0-2
Most likely score, at 11.3%
Most likely scores
0-211.3%
0-39.4%
1-29.3%
0-19.0%
1-37.7%
1-17.4%
Strength and dominance
Team strength and finishing efficiency
Recent results need context. These measures account for opponent quality and the balance of play.
| Measure | Ferrymead Bays | Cashmere Technical | How to read it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strength (Elo) | 1581 | 1738 | The league average is 1500. A higher rating indicates stronger results after adjusting for opponent quality. |
| Change over the last 10 | 17 | 92 | Rating gained or lost over the last ten matches |
| Opposition strength | 1503 | 1500 | Average opponent rating over the last 20 matches. Above 1500 indicates a tougher schedule. |
Goals
When teams score and how matches unfold
Averages hide the distribution. Teams with similar goals per match can have very different patterns of scorelines.
Goals by half
| Team | 1H scored | 2H scored | 1H conceded | 2H conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrymead Bays | 1.32 | 0.74 | 0.47 | 0.53 |
| Cashmere Technical | 2.68 | 2.32 | 0.16 | 0.21 |
Total goals
| Team | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4+ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrymead Bays | 10% | 10% | 16% | 26% | 37% |
| Cashmere Technical | 0% | 0% | 5% | 10% | 84% |
Context
Coming into the match
Home and away performance, rest since the last match, and each team's manager.
2.20
Ferrymead Bays at home, 10 matches
3.00
Cashmere Technical away, 10 matches
28d
Days of rest for Ferrymead Bays
27d
Days of rest for Cashmere Technical
—
Manager of Ferrymead Bays
—
Manager of Cashmere Technical
0
Matches for Ferrymead Bays in the last 14 days
0
Matches for Cashmere Technical in the last 14 days
19
Points for Ferrymead Bays behind the leaders, and 29 above the relegation zone
3
Points for Cashmere Technical behind the leaders, and 45 above the relegation zone
3.55
League goals per match
15.3%
League draw rate
Statistics
Side-by-side comparison
Averages over each team's last 20 matches. The left bar represents Ferrymead Bays, the right bar represents Cashmere Technical.
On the ball
4.69
9.86
corners
—
—
fouls
2.56
1.5
yellow cards
Recent form
| Team | Last 10 | PPG | goals | streak |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrymead Bays | DWWLWWDLLW | 1.70 | 2.10–0.90 | 1D |
| Cashmere Technical | WWWWWWWWDW | 2.80 | 4.70–0.40 | 8W |
At half-time
| Team | ahead | level | behind | comeback wins | lead lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrymead Bays | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 |
| Cashmere Technical | 16 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Squads
Injuries and suspensions
0 players reported unavailable or doubtful across both teams, with the reason.
Ferrymead Bays
No absences reported.
Cashmere Technical
No absences reported.
Newsroom
News about both teams
No recent news linked to these teams.